<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PowerSet: Good For Searching Wikipedia!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/2008/05/12/powerset-good-for-searching-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/2008/05/12/powerset-good-for-searching-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>I say potato, you say potato...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 03:56:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ender</title>
		<link>http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/2008/05/12/powerset-good-for-searching-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-44856</link>
		<dc:creator>Ender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 05:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/?p=753#comment-44856</guid>
		<description>NLP might be suitable for searching something with extremely limited scope and uniform structure (Wikipedia articles), but the default Wikipedia search is already quite adept at finding what I want. Interesting idea, but still a long ways from being a definitive improvement over &quot;keywordese&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NLP might be suitable for searching something with extremely limited scope and uniform structure (Wikipedia articles), but the default Wikipedia search is already quite adept at finding what I want. Interesting idea, but still a long ways from being a definitive improvement over &#8220;keywordese&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hung</title>
		<link>http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/2008/05/12/powerset-good-for-searching-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-44834</link>
		<dc:creator>Hung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/?p=753#comment-44834</guid>
		<description>Okay, PowerSet might serve well as a neat-o frontend for Wikipedia. But that qualify it as a search engine? Even after expanding the sources of content to many site won&#039;t do much for finding anything in the &quot;deep web&quot; if you guys don&#039;t have some kind of crawler. Maybe you do and you&#039;re not returning results from it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, PowerSet might serve well as a neat-o frontend for Wikipedia. But that qualify it as a search engine? Even after expanding the sources of content to many site won&#8217;t do much for finding anything in the &#8220;deep web&#8221; if you guys don&#8217;t have some kind of crawler. Maybe you do and you&#8217;re not returning results from it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/2008/05/12/powerset-good-for-searching-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-44832</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/?p=753#comment-44832</guid>
		<description>Search for topics that are in Wikipedia and you&#039;ll get a much better experience.  You don&#039;t even need to ask a question: just type in a topic name.  Also, check out our enhanced Wikipedia pages that have tools for summarizing content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search for topics that are in Wikipedia and you&#8217;ll get a much better experience.  You don&#8217;t even need to ask a question: just type in a topic name.  Also, check out our enhanced Wikipedia pages that have tools for summarizing content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

