<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PowerSet: Good For Searching Wikipedia!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/2008/05/12/powerset-good-for-searching-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/2008/05/12/powerset-good-for-searching-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>I say potato, you say potato...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ender</title>
		<link>http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/2008/05/12/powerset-good-for-searching-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-44856</link>
		<dc:creator>Ender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 05:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/?p=753#comment-44856</guid>
		<description>NLP might be suitable for searching something with extremely limited scope and uniform structure (Wikipedia articles), but the default Wikipedia search is already quite adept at finding what I want. Interesting idea, but still a long ways from being a definitive improvement over "keywordese".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NLP might be suitable for searching something with extremely limited scope and uniform structure (Wikipedia articles), but the default Wikipedia search is already quite adept at finding what I want. Interesting idea, but still a long ways from being a definitive improvement over &#8220;keywordese&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hung</title>
		<link>http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/2008/05/12/powerset-good-for-searching-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-44834</link>
		<dc:creator>Hung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/?p=753#comment-44834</guid>
		<description>Okay, PowerSet might serve well as a neat-o frontend for Wikipedia. But that qualify it as a search engine? Even after expanding the sources of content to many site won't do much for finding anything in the "deep web" if you guys don't have some kind of crawler. Maybe you do and you're not returning results from it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, PowerSet might serve well as a neat-o frontend for Wikipedia. But that qualify it as a search engine? Even after expanding the sources of content to many site won&#8217;t do much for finding anything in the &#8220;deep web&#8221; if you guys don&#8217;t have some kind of crawler. Maybe you do and you&#8217;re not returning results from it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/2008/05/12/powerset-good-for-searching-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-44832</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hung-truong.com/blog/?p=753#comment-44832</guid>
		<description>Search for topics that are in Wikipedia and you'll get a much better experience.  You don't even need to ask a question: just type in a topic name.  Also, check out our enhanced Wikipedia pages that have tools for summarizing content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search for topics that are in Wikipedia and you&#8217;ll get a much better experience.  You don&#8217;t even need to ask a question: just type in a topic name.  Also, check out our enhanced Wikipedia pages that have tools for summarizing content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
